Category: Podcasts

Episode 7 – There are four lights!

Published January 26, 2021 by wrm

Today our hosts explore some of the more insidious tactics used by the corporate media to control the public mind. After taking a quick detour…

Leave a Comment

Episode 6 – Sherlock Holmes and the Question of Narrative

Episode 6 – Sherlock Holmes and the Question of Narrative

Published January 19, 2021 by wrm

In Episode 6 Bobby and Jordan discuss the ongoing political theater developing in corporate news circles. While describing the scripted narrative playing out over the…

1 Comment

Episode 5 – Avalanche

Episode 5 – Avalanche

Published January 12, 2021 by wrm

Recorded on January 11th. Bobby and Jordan discuss the chaos in the capitol and the rapidly deteriorating situation in the American political situation. “If you…

Leave a Comment

Episode 4, Part 2 – Free-Form Predictions for 2021

Published January 5, 2021 by wrm

In episode 4 part 2 Bobby and Jordan continue their discussion of predictions for 2021 in a more free-form format. Are we facing an alien…

Leave a Comment

Episode 4, Part 1 – Predictions for 2021

Published January 5, 2021 by wrm

In episode 4, boldly recorded Monday January 4th, 2021 instead of on or after January 6th, Bobby and Jordan predict the future … accurately? Prediction…

1 Comment

Episode 3 – Lest We Forget

Episode 3 – Lest We Forget

Published December 29, 2020 by wrm

In this episode, Bobby and Jordan pull back the veil on the intense level of mind-control and censorship both voluntary and forced occurring in modern…

Leave a Comment

Episode 2 – What is Real?

Episode 2 – What is Real?

Published December 23, 2020 by wrm

In our second episode of the Mind Virus Podcast Jordan and Bobby address the question “What is Real?” in the modern digital world. Your browser…

Leave a Comment

Mind Virus Podcast Episode 1

Mind Virus Podcast Episode 1

Published December 16, 2020 by wrm

This is our historic first episode. The topic? Year in Review 2020 In this episode Bobby and Jordan review not only the year 2020, but…

2 Comments

This website and podcast contains some quotations and excerpts from copyrighted material. These uses fall well within the copyright doctrine of "Fair Use."

Section 107 of the United States Code, Title 17, specifies the conditions under which, "the fair use of a copyrighted work . . . for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching . . ., scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright." It provides four considerations for determining fair use: (1) The purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes, (2) The nature of the copyrighted work, (3) The amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and (4) The effect of the use upon the potential market for, or value of, the copyrighted work.

The use on this website and podcast of other material is primarily for criticism, comment, news reporting, scholarship or research and teaching. (1) (a) The "purpose and character" of the website, podcast and any derivative book(s) are not commercial. (b) The overwhelming majority of the material is the authors' original work. It is in no way a mere collection of others’ copyrighted works, nor competitive with those sources. (2) The nature of the copyrighted work quoted is often "news" or "history," categories given lesser protection in fair use cases than works of fiction. (3) Most uses involve excerpts rather than entire works.

Because the adverse financial impact on copyright owners is central to the purpose of copyright law, and the analysis of alleged violations, it’s relevant to note that, under factor (4), (a) no one in search of the quoted material would substitute this website, podcast or related book(s) for the original source, (b) it is highly unlikely this website, podcast, or book(s) created from it will ever have more than a de minimis impact on any of the copyright works’ potential market, and (c) to the extent it might do so, it would be far more likely be a positive, rather than a negative, impact (by drawing attention to the work, crediting it, and providing a source where it may be found).