Episode 187 – Blithering Idiots or Liars

Published July 9, 2024 by wrm

As we watch the public narrative surrounding Biden’s competency shift dramatically, we must ask ourselves, do they expect us to believe they are just figuring this out? They want us to believe they are blithering idiots rather than pathological liars. Amazing!

Some people like to listen to us faster… (We sound smarter.):
Change playback speed real time: 1x – 1.25x – 1.5x – 1.75x – 2x

Referenced in the Podcast

Published in Podcasts

3 Comments

Publius July 9, 2024

Trump term was hardly fine. His cabinet was awful. Even if the Deep State pressured his choices, it only means Trump is actually pathetically weak.

Put any other candidate and the election would be so easy. Should have done way better in the primary, especially now that Trump is again disenfranchising voters with his more pro-choice views being officially put into the party’s platform, probably thinking it would pull more independent women.

If Biden gets replaced by anyone, other than Kamela, will crush Trump.

The Church’s bit about all rights can be reasonably revoked in a crisis was definitely from Oaks. In fact, he said almost word for word the same thing in a speech around the same time as the Church’s announcement.

Reply
I play the radio July 11, 2024

“…the woman who looks like a guy. What’s her name?
That doesn’t narrow it down much ”

“Go ahead and cut him loose, but be ready to issue a Silver Alert an hour later.”

Reply
TBM July 14, 2024

Best rendition of Gin & Juice:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VxsG7k1mgn4

Reply

Leave a Reply

This website and podcast contains some quotations and excerpts from copyrighted material. These uses fall well within the copyright doctrine of "Fair Use."

Section 107 of the United States Code, Title 17, specifies the conditions under which, "the fair use of a copyrighted work . . . for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching . . ., scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright." It provides four considerations for determining fair use: (1) The purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes, (2) The nature of the copyrighted work, (3) The amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and (4) The effect of the use upon the potential market for, or value of, the copyrighted work.

The use on this website and podcast of other material is primarily for criticism, comment, news reporting, scholarship or research and teaching. (1) (a) The "purpose and character" of the website, podcast and any derivative book(s) are not commercial. (b) The overwhelming majority of the material is the authors' original work. It is in no way a mere collection of others’ copyrighted works, nor competitive with those sources. (2) The nature of the copyrighted work quoted is often "news" or "history," categories given lesser protection in fair use cases than works of fiction. (3) Most uses involve excerpts rather than entire works.

Because the adverse financial impact on copyright owners is central to the purpose of copyright law, and the analysis of alleged violations, it’s relevant to note that, under factor (4), (a) no one in search of the quoted material would substitute this website, podcast or related book(s) for the original source, (b) it is highly unlikely this website, podcast, or book(s) created from it will ever have more than a de minimis impact on any of the copyright works’ potential market, and (c) to the extent it might do so, it would be far more likely be a positive, rather than a negative, impact (by drawing attention to the work, crediting it, and providing a source where it may be found).