Episode 248 – Peculiar People

Published September 9, 2025 by wrm

“I thought we were better than this,” is becoming a common sentiment with the normies out there. What is going on with the world today? Join in for the latest with Bobby and Jordan.

Some people like to listen to us faster… (We sound smarter.):
Change playback speed real time: 1x – 1.25x – 1.5x – 1.75x – 2x

Referenced in the Podcast

Published in Podcasts

3 Comments

Publius September 10, 2025

I tuned into a little of The Bobby’s stream. He’s definitely a professional streamer to go 11:20+

All this 100 years old (from last year) and 101 this year just reaks of some who are focused on creating a legacy narrative for him with the can’t say Mormon campaign, logo change, and the peacemaker media posts and news piece and talks. It seems that he can be a little egotistical. Maybe I’m wrong and if so, I apologize.

I accidentally saw the stabbing video (on X everyone is posting the end-point of the stabbing and after the guy walks away). She didn’t die immediately. No one helped her bleeding out.

“It’s fall”. As I stare at a Forecast For the next 10 days of mid 90s each day.

Obviously today, we’ve hit some weird, even darker turning point in the nation, with the assassination of Charlie Kirk. Hopefully nothing wild happens tomorrow on 9/11.

People are predicting that this coming General Conference will be one of the most important ever, but I’m guessing it’ll be more of the same, with a continuation of peacemaker talks.

Reply
Whitaker September 11, 2025

This video of Howie Mandel with RFK is a great demonstration of why the government and media seem to not mind lying to everyone’s faces. People just remember the last talking point instead of what was claimed before.
https://x.com/ThomasSowell/status/1924228503320637581

This bad memory is why people fall for the “climate change” nonsense. They just don’t remember the consistency over their lives.

Reply
- Jordan September 12, 2025
  
  They never let him show the video. ??? Lame.
  
  Reply

Leave a Reply

This website and podcast contains some quotations and excerpts from copyrighted material. These uses fall well within the copyright doctrine of "Fair Use."

Section 107 of the United States Code, Title 17, specifies the conditions under which, "the fair use of a copyrighted work . . . for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching . . ., scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright." It provides four considerations for determining fair use: (1) The purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes, (2) The nature of the copyrighted work, (3) The amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and (4) The effect of the use upon the potential market for, or value of, the copyrighted work.

The use on this website and podcast of other material is primarily for criticism, comment, news reporting, scholarship or research and teaching. (1) (a) The "purpose and character" of the website, podcast and any derivative book(s) are not commercial. (b) The overwhelming majority of the material is the authors' original work. It is in no way a mere collection of others’ copyrighted works, nor competitive with those sources. (2) The nature of the copyrighted work quoted is often "news" or "history," categories given lesser protection in fair use cases than works of fiction. (3) Most uses involve excerpts rather than entire works.

Because the adverse financial impact on copyright owners is central to the purpose of copyright law, and the analysis of alleged violations, it’s relevant to note that, under factor (4), (a) no one in search of the quoted material would substitute this website, podcast or related book(s) for the original source, (b) it is highly unlikely this website, podcast, or book(s) created from it will ever have more than a de minimis impact on any of the copyright works’ potential market, and (c) to the extent it might do so, it would be far more likely be a positive, rather than a negative, impact (by drawing attention to the work, crediting it, and providing a source where it may be found).