Episode 281 – The Sound of Mission

If you’re looking for your daily dose, join Bobby and Jordan today as they explore light, gather hope and share a message of faith for all podmeisters the world over.

Some people like to listen to us faster… (We sound smarter.):
Change playback speed real time: 1x – 1.25x – 1.5x – 1.75x – 2x

Referenced in the Podcast

Publius May 1, 2026

There’s ample evidence that there was zero security at the entrance to the building. They only had 2 girls checking for tickets at the door.
Maybe they let it happen to pressure the ballroom (ie whatever secret underground intelligence complex using the ballroom as cover) into being built.
Trump never has attended a single one of these. The position of FBI director never has. Some Joe schmo runs through paper walls and gets somewhat close to Trump yet again? Something is off.
And all the X influencer talking point posts going out at the same time pushing for the ballroom immediately after.

Hans Zimmer, of course, is another great movie score composer. Martin O’Donnell did great in Halo.

Trump says insider trading is what it is:
https://x.com/i/status/2047479288274780354

Trump went to war with Iran at the request of Israel:
https://x.com/i/status/2047518134379167828

Driver surveillance mandate by 2027:
https://x.com/i/status/2048103520495153548

Is SLC the next Minneapolis?
https://x.com/i/status/2048358022200590478

Cox says it’s Utah’s (and all other state’s) duty to house data centers:
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/18XHgGnymM/

Considering USA benefits to IDF soldiers:
https://x.com/i/status/2048471445014270380

WH ballroom was supposed to be entirely privately funded, but now it’ll likely be on the taxpayers (and we know that they’re building a massive complex underground, probably important to the intelligence agencies, and the ballroom is just the red herring):
https://x.com/i/status/2048888059987366320
https://x.com/i/status/2048925237622845786
In fact, he will pay for it himself:
https://x.com/i/status/2048927776263033093

3rd attemp: video of cop looking in the door with a police dog. Presumably talks to the perpetrator. Walks away and literally immediately the guy runs through the door with a rifle/shotgun. Isn’t that weird?
https://x.com/i/status/2050033191298224340

This website and podcast contains some quotations and excerpts from copyrighted material. These uses fall well within the copyright doctrine of "Fair Use."

Section 107 of the United States Code, Title 17, specifies the conditions under which, "the fair use of a copyrighted work . . . for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching . . ., scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright." It provides four considerations for determining fair use: (1) The purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes, (2) The nature of the copyrighted work, (3) The amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and (4) The effect of the use upon the potential market for, or value of, the copyrighted work.

The use on this website and podcast of other material is primarily for criticism, comment, news reporting, scholarship or research and teaching. (1) (a) The "purpose and character" of the website, podcast and any derivative book(s) are not commercial. (b) The overwhelming majority of the material is the authors' original work. It is in no way a mere collection of others’ copyrighted works, nor competitive with those sources. (2) The nature of the copyrighted work quoted is often "news" or "history," categories given lesser protection in fair use cases than works of fiction. (3) Most uses involve excerpts rather than entire works.

Because the adverse financial impact on copyright owners is central to the purpose of copyright law, and the analysis of alleged violations, it’s relevant to note that, under factor (4), (a) no one in search of the quoted material would substitute this website, podcast or related book(s) for the original source, (b) it is highly unlikely this website, podcast, or book(s) created from it will ever have more than a de minimis impact on any of the copyright works’ potential market, and (c) to the extent it might do so, it would be far more likely be a positive, rather than a negative, impact (by drawing attention to the work, crediting it, and providing a source where it may be found).

Episode 281 – The Sound of Mission

Referenced in the Podcast

3 Comments