Episode 266 – Stoppage Time

Published January 13, 2026 by wrm

What could be more boring than baseball you ask? Soccer of course. Perhaps you disagree. Listen in for the latest on this controversial topic and topics orders of magnitude even more controversial.

Some people like to listen to us faster… (We sound smarter.):
Change playback speed real time: 1x – 1.25x – 1.5x – 1.75x – 2x

Referenced in the Podcast

Published in Podcasts

7 Comments

Publius January 13, 2026

The Temple Square mission will be no more after July 2026.

Yes, some soccer players experience severe anal prolapse in their leg for a few minutes when coming near an opponent.

The NBA is definitely not exciting anymore. Now all it is is 3 point shots, traveling, and a bit of anal prolapse episodes borrowed from soccer.

James Lindsay is the Woke Right.

How well did the public political process work during COVID? For those who rightfully ignored tyrannical edicts?
How many businesses are no more because of the tyrannical edicts and they had no real recourse in the public political process?

And obviously Trump is a Trojan-horse. I mean, his first term was awful. This one looks just as bad.
Any Republican would have beaten Kamala. But no, we had to take the most difficult route for the election with a really crappy candidate who we already knew was really crappy.
Here’s yet another example of his awfulness: “BREAKING: President Trump to interview BlackRock CIO Rick Rieder for Federal Reserve Chair.”

Candace Owens never said Ericka Kirk was involved. That’s just more twisting of words never spoken. Go to the source, remember?

Reply
- Publius January 15, 2026
  
  Have some more trojan horse: “BREAKING: Trump DOJ will not take up any of Rand Paul’s referrals to investigate Anthony Fauci, per the senator.”
  
  Reply
- Publius January 20, 2026
  
  Since Charlie Kirk was mentioned, one of the most damning things that suggest some inside involvement is that his security team never presented or created any security plans for his future events, including for the following day, after his UVU visit. Those security plans take weeks to plan and to coordinate with local law enforcement.
  
  Reply
PepeLePew January 14, 2026

That’s it!! My gloves are coming off!! Baseball is not boring when there is great pitching. Neither is soccer when it is a very offensive minded game. Basketball ain’t the same since the 90s. I tell you what’s boring…watching grass grow, NFL, NHL, and women sports minus volleyball and gymnastic. Yep! I’m a perv!! Go ahead an sue me! XOXO

Reply
TBM January 17, 2026

hey guys: the term AWFUL is now a slur and dangerous to use: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/17/us/politics/white-women-conservatives.html?unlocked_article_code=1.FFA.yXGx._ONRlqHwJ0R9&smid=url-share

Reply
Whitaker January 18, 2026

This is an important article that explains what’s going on in the world:
https://www.zerohedge.com/personal-finance/why-young-women-moved-left-while-young-men-stayed-sane

Reply
- Jordan January 18, 2026
  
  Thanks… Yes. I think that’s a very important article.
  
  Also good:
  https://www.zerohedge.com/political/msm-melting-down-over-new-term-liberal-white-women
  
  Quote (so astute):
  After years of using terms like “Nazi” and “fascist” against Trump and Republicans, the paper’s outrage over AWFUL rings hollow. The acronym simply states observable demographic and ideological facts. Affluent, white, female, urban, and liberal are not slurs. Yes, the acronym is clever, but its implied criticism is far milder than the relentless, extreme rhetoric the New York Times has long published against the right, particularly President Trump.
  
  TBM pointed out the NYT article to me.
  Reply? A wanghaf does not care about NYT declaring wrongthing.
  
  Reply

Leave a Reply

This website and podcast contains some quotations and excerpts from copyrighted material. These uses fall well within the copyright doctrine of "Fair Use."

Section 107 of the United States Code, Title 17, specifies the conditions under which, "the fair use of a copyrighted work . . . for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching . . ., scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright." It provides four considerations for determining fair use: (1) The purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes, (2) The nature of the copyrighted work, (3) The amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and (4) The effect of the use upon the potential market for, or value of, the copyrighted work.

The use on this website and podcast of other material is primarily for criticism, comment, news reporting, scholarship or research and teaching. (1) (a) The "purpose and character" of the website, podcast and any derivative book(s) are not commercial. (b) The overwhelming majority of the material is the authors' original work. It is in no way a mere collection of others’ copyrighted works, nor competitive with those sources. (2) The nature of the copyrighted work quoted is often "news" or "history," categories given lesser protection in fair use cases than works of fiction. (3) Most uses involve excerpts rather than entire works.

Because the adverse financial impact on copyright owners is central to the purpose of copyright law, and the analysis of alleged violations, it’s relevant to note that, under factor (4), (a) no one in search of the quoted material would substitute this website, podcast or related book(s) for the original source, (b) it is highly unlikely this website, podcast, or book(s) created from it will ever have more than a de minimis impact on any of the copyright works’ potential market, and (c) to the extent it might do so, it would be far more likely be a positive, rather than a negative, impact (by drawing attention to the work, crediting it, and providing a source where it may be found).