Episode 267 – It’s What They Want

Published January 19, 2026 by wrm

The left is insanely unhinged. The right attempts to enforce order. Dramatic conflict ensues. The bad guys win either way.

Some people like to listen to us faster… (We sound smarter.):
Change playback speed real time: 1x – 1.25x – 1.5x – 1.75x – 2x

Referenced in the Podcast

Published in Podcasts

6 Comments

Whitaker January 21, 2026

I’m glad you appreciated my sharing of the article. I am listening to you talking about the women wanting some manhood in their life and it reminded me of this video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CdDq1m-dcmM

Reply
Troymurica aka The real TBM January 21, 2026

RAIDER NATION

Reply
The real TBM January 21, 2026

Heads need to roll…literally.

Reply
I play the radio January 23, 2026

“That’s like an oxymoron, meaning a moron on oxy”
“It’s kind of a made-for-tv apocalypse “

Reply
Publius January 28, 2026

Yes, Trump is doing some good things with immigration and the border, but he isn’t doing mass deportations. Hes only going after the worst of the worst. He wants to keep a lot of illegals and he wants to keep 600k Chinese students. Check this article here from just after the election.

Alex Jones has lost himself the last few months. He’s at war with himself.

The powers that be don’t have to do anything with Trump. He’s gonna throw away the midterms and 2028, amd he’s awful on the 2A, so they’re good right now. They’re perfectly fine with everything he’s doing.

There is a problem going after Maduro. Gotta contend with the Constitution, and that the president didn’t get authorization from Congress. And if the reason to do it was due to drugs (fentanyl doesn’tcome from Venezuela), there are far more dangerous places where drugs are coming into the US than Venezuela, such as Mexico, and by extension, China, so why didn’t we go grab their presidents first, or since?

Reply
- Publius January 28, 2026
  
  Here’s the article about Trump pre-planning (after being elected) to keep many illegals: https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2024/dec/8/donald-trump-says-wants-deal-daca-amnesty/
  
  Reply

Leave a Reply to Publius Cancel reply

This website and podcast contains some quotations and excerpts from copyrighted material. These uses fall well within the copyright doctrine of "Fair Use."

Section 107 of the United States Code, Title 17, specifies the conditions under which, "the fair use of a copyrighted work . . . for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching . . ., scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright." It provides four considerations for determining fair use: (1) The purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes, (2) The nature of the copyrighted work, (3) The amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and (4) The effect of the use upon the potential market for, or value of, the copyrighted work.

The use on this website and podcast of other material is primarily for criticism, comment, news reporting, scholarship or research and teaching. (1) (a) The "purpose and character" of the website, podcast and any derivative book(s) are not commercial. (b) The overwhelming majority of the material is the authors' original work. It is in no way a mere collection of others’ copyrighted works, nor competitive with those sources. (2) The nature of the copyrighted work quoted is often "news" or "history," categories given lesser protection in fair use cases than works of fiction. (3) Most uses involve excerpts rather than entire works.

Because the adverse financial impact on copyright owners is central to the purpose of copyright law, and the analysis of alleged violations, it’s relevant to note that, under factor (4), (a) no one in search of the quoted material would substitute this website, podcast or related book(s) for the original source, (b) it is highly unlikely this website, podcast, or book(s) created from it will ever have more than a de minimis impact on any of the copyright works’ potential market, and (c) to the extent it might do so, it would be far more likely be a positive, rather than a negative, impact (by drawing attention to the work, crediting it, and providing a source where it may be found).